WF08 / Work / Keep watch

Track meaningful competitor changes with evidence

Keep a dated baseline and report what changed, where it changed, and why it might matter.

Make it yoursSee the sample

THE WAY THROUGH

From your material to a useful result.

  1. 01

    Pick specific pages and facts: plan limits, releases, integrations, or positioning.

  2. 02

    Capture the baseline, checked date, and exact relevant facts. Keep event dates separate from publication dates.

  3. 03

    Compare the next successful observation; separate substantive changes from page rearrangements.

  4. 04

    Explain possible implications as hypotheses, and include unchanged or unavailable sources in the check log.

A FICTIONAL TASK TO PRACTICE ON

Here’s the job.

Fictional baseline: Acme plan page September 1 lists 5 projects for $20/month. Current supplied snapshot September 9 lists 8 projects for $20/month. Release blog is inaccessible.

What a careful result should contain

Observed change: included projects increased from 5 to 8; price remains $20/month. Source: supplied plan snapshots, September 1 and 9.
Inference: this may affect comparisons based on project limits.
Unknown: release blog could not be checked. No claim about other product changes.

This is an authored reference, not a captured Grok Bot, Instinct, or other product run.

BEFORE YOU RELY ON IT

Give the result a proper check.

  • Every change has a before value, after value, and source.
  • A failed fetch is not evidence of a removed feature.
  • An inference about strategy is labelled as an inference.

Try to break it

A page fails to load twice. Pass: retain the last observed value with its old date. Fail: announce that the plan was removed.

TAKE IT FOR A SPIN

Bring your own details.

Describe your task and paste the source material you want to use. This page prepares a prompt; your chosen AI tool does the work.

These details stay in this page until you copy them. They are not saved or sent to a model here.

Read the full starting instructions
Compare the supplied or authorized primary sources against a dated baseline. Return meaningful before/after changes with URLs and observation dates, separate event dates, unchanged pages, and failed checks. Label business implications as hypotheses. Do not infer deletion from unavailable pages. Propose a monitoring schedule only if the tool supports persistence and scheduling.

Did you get a result you could use?