Work/Research & decisions
Build a competitor comparison from primary sources
Normalize product claims and capabilities with dates and supporting links.
WHAT YOU’LL MAKESource-backed comparison
WHAT TO BRINGOfficial pages · Comparison criteria
Compare the same claim on the same basis.
- 01
Set the criteria first: the job you need done, required capabilities, relevant plan, and any constraints.
- 02
Use official pages or supplied excerpts and keep the source date and plan context beside each claim.
- 03
Separate what the source explicitly states from your inference, then identify what a demo or trial still needs to answer.
Your starting prompt
Replace the bracketed details or make it yours using the form.
Build a competitor comparison using primary-source evidence. OFFICIAL PAGES OR EXCERPTS [Add official pages] COMPARISON CRITERIA [Add comparison criteria] Use one row per criterion and one column per product. Cite the supporting source for each factual claim and include its date and plan context where available. Separate quoted product claims, supported facts, and inference. Mark unsupported or unavailable details as unknown; absence from a page is not proof a capability is missing. Do not invent current prices or access unread links. If live research is unavailable, work only from supplied excerpts and identify the research still needed. End with use-case tradeoffs and questions for a demo or trial.
Give it a second look.
- A missing claim is labeled unknown, not treated as proof that a feature is absent.
- Plan-specific limits are not generalized to an entire product.
A FOLLOW-UP WORTH TRYING
“Remove the winner ranking. Show which option fits each stated use case, what evidence supports that fit, and the unanswered questions.”
The capability to look for
An assistant that can work with the supplied text; file upload is helpful for documents.
Find a tool for the jobHow these ideas and prompts are made